Instapundit on Bush's press conference

[cema]

What are you going to do about Iran's role as a source of destabilization in the area? And its rather obvious efforts to acquire nuclear weapons? And its sponsorship of anti-American terrorism?

A year after the invasion, the Marines are seeking donations from blog readers to set up TV stations in Iraq so as to counter anti-American propaganda from Al Jazeera and other hostile media. Why wasn't this a priority from day one? Why isn't it one now?

Why didn't you fire George Tenet after 9/11?

When Iraqi blogs were reporting problems with Sadr months ago, why didn't the U.S. government take action sooner?

The press, however, seems to have missed a good chance to ask right questions.

Comments

На кичке

[cema.livejournal.com]

There are many reasons Bush is not likely to give a good answer to these questions. But the message was directed by Instapundit towards members of the press, not to him. Of course the blogs will not replace the media, but they are a good supplement and can have a revigorating effect. They are being noticed.

Re: На кичке

[email-animal.livejournal.com]

I should probably try to better explain what I meant.
Basically, I tend to agree with the assessement that
the questions could have been tougher etc... But I find
the proposed list of questions to be self-promoting
and thus, somewhat disingenuous. The very same point
could have been made without attracting attention to
the witty author and the wonderful new medium he uses
to express thoughts.

Nevermind... You will post something tomorrow, and we'll
argue more...

Re: На кичке

[cema.livejournal.com]

The blog questions are tongue-in-cheek, but there are real questions there as well.

Re: На кичке

[email-animal.livejournal.com]

I did not catch the tongue-in-cheek aspect of it.