Q: Do you think that is possible, I mean the movie is very famous under that title now?
RB:- Who cares? Nobody will see his movie, it is almost dead already. Nevermind, nobody cares.
He mostly appears to be really bitter about the title. Yet, I do not possibly see how one can trademark "Farenheight + number", so, I do not see an issue here from the point of trademark/copyright law.
R.B. is an old fart man, and I have a feeling his emotions, in this case, overwhelm his thinking. Certainly, this is not a big deal, and, as others note, the title is not copyrighted.
And the fact that M.M. is an unpleasant man has nothing to do with the quality of his work. Gogol too was unpleasant, so what.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
One man's hero, another man's thief
Q: Do you think that is possible, I mean the movie is very famous under that title now?
RB: - Who cares? Nobody will see his movie, it is almost dead already. Nevermind, nobody cares.
He mostly appears to be really bitter about the title. Yet, I do not possibly see how one can trademark "Farenheight + number", so, I do not see an issue here from the point of trademark/copyright law.
The fragment above shows, that RB might be somewhat delusional, given that companies are lining in front of H. Weinstein's office for the right to distribute the movie. I personally intend to see the movie the day it hits the theaters.
Re: One man's hero, another man's thief
fartman, and I have a feeling his emotions, in this case, overwhelm his thinking. Certainly, this is not a big deal, and, as others note, the title is not copyrighted.And the fact that M.M. is an unpleasant man has nothing to do with the quality of his work. Gogol too was unpleasant, so what.
But I think it is a fun glimpse at the two men.
Re: One man's hero, another man's thief
no subject
Мур это скорее Чичиков, чем Гоголь...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject