9/11

[cema]

Instapundit.

Comments

[anhinga-anhinga.livejournal.com]

I have not seen this post, before I posted something else referring to him.

LJ-synchronicity rules (1 hour of difference)...

[email-animal.livejournal.com]

He is observing an anniversary of a terrorist attack by giving shooting lessons?

You sure you linked to the right post?

[anhinga-anhinga.livejournal.com]

Of course, what could be wrong with that?

Training for combat/self-defense is what a libertarian would do in the face of terrorism.

[email-animal.livejournal.com]

Let us leave for the for moment the utter sillyness of the idea of defending with a handgun from "the face of terrorism" (and yes, this is something I'd expect a libertatian to do).

What I was wondering about is why cema decided that a note of someone doing target practice on September 11 was worth linking. Most of cema's "serious" links tend to point to articles which (whether I agree with them or not) tend to contain actual expressions of thoughts or, at the very least, opinions. Maybe I missed something in the text?

[email-animal.livejournal.com]

strike that "about" from the second sentence.

[cema.livejournal.com]

I simply think this is interesting. People react in different ways.

[email-animal.livejournal.com]

So, for the sake of stupid me - you did link it because of the shooting thing?

[cema.livejournal.com]

Actually, no; it did not strike me as anything unusual, frankly. The fact that a law professor is teaching a Marine how to shoot (handguns, but still) loooked funny to me.