Let us leave for the for moment the utter sillyness of the idea of defending with a handgun from "the face of terrorism" (and yes, this is something I'd expect a libertatian to do).
What I was wondering about is why cema decided that a note of someone doing target practice on September 11 was worth linking. Most of cema's "serious" links tend to point to articles which (whether I agree with them or not) tend to contain actual expressions of thoughts or, at the very least, opinions. Maybe I missed something in the text?
Actually, no; it did not strike me as anything unusual, frankly. The fact that a law professor is teaching a Marine how to shoot (handguns, but still) loooked funny to me.
no subject
You sure you linked to the right post?
no subject
Training for combat/self-defense is what a libertarian would do in the face of terrorism.
no subject
What I was wondering about is why
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject