He caught it on a glue trap, and could not separate it, I seem to remember. And I am sure there was some unused sticky surface on that glue trap, so a burning branch or smth could get glued to it.
With cigarettes, one has to be around flammable material, and there is plenty of that in bedrooms. Which portion of the house did the flaming mouse go to?
or that the alternative version was that some burning leaves or flames from them got into the house, which is equally suspect (not a frequent cause of fire in the reports we see).
mouse house not a mouse not a house mouse not a house whatever...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
The guy just denied it, because he looked really bad in it, and many people felt he deserved the result... which must be very unpleasant.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Here is a mouse.
And here is a house.
And here is a burning mouse in a burning house.
La-la-la...
no subject
no subject
no subject
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=mouse+fire
yields some interesting results. Like that the man changed his story back, so he says again that it was the mouse:
http://www.snopes.com/media/notnews/mousefire.asp
http://www.newsday.com/sns-ap-mouse-fire,0,702114.story
or that the alternative version was that some burning leaves or flames from them got into the house, which is equally suspect (not a frequent cause of fire in the reports we see).
mouse house
not a mouse
not a house
mouse
not a house
whatever...
no subject
In a house
Gives me a pause.