September 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
34 56789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Wednesday, June 20th, 2007 07:27 pm
From J'Post:
Carter's ambassador to the UN, Andrew Young, said "Khomeini will eventually be hailed as a saint." Carter's Iranian ambassador, William Sullivan, said, "Khomeini is a Gandhi-like figure."
Is this true? Did they actually say this? Was it consistent with the official policy of the US at the time?
Thursday, June 21st, 2007 12:54 am (UTC)
Thinking about it - do you know Carter position on the USSR before they invaded Afghanistan? How about him asking Soviet Ambassador Dobrynin for help with the US Presidential elections against Reagan?
Thursday, June 21st, 2007 01:36 am (UTC)
I know Carter's position on the USSR and, more relevant, on Iran, and I know he was reluctant to confront Khomeini. I did not know his "ambassadors" were actually saying things like these. I am not surprised he personally was an idiot then seeing how he is an idiot now. But there is a difference between an idiot in a political office (voted in–voted out or assigned–resigned) and idiots in the professional corps.
Thursday, June 21st, 2007 03:24 am (UTC)
Actually, seeking Soviet's help in the US election hardly qualifies as "idiocy". The more appropriate word is "treason".
Thursday, June 21st, 2007 05:12 am (UTC)
We are digressing here; I do not think he was seeking Iran's endorsement. Calling Khomeini a saint or a Ghandi-like figure is more than a stretch.