Account name:
Password
(OpenID?)
(Forgot it?)
Remember Me
You're viewing
cema
's journal
Create a Dreamwidth Account
Learn More
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
Reload page in style:
site
light
Просьба выражаться
Fish of features
September
2017
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Navigation
Recent Entries
Archive
Reading
Tags
Memories
Profile
Page Summary
riftsh.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
Style Credit
Style:
Blue
for
Drifting
by
Jennie Griner
Resources:
OSWD design
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Harvard and scholarship
cema
Sunday,
September
16th
,
2007
04:24 pm
Uninformed, meme-repeating, lead by heart but not my mind. Especially depressing when you realize it is a member of the faculty writing
this
.
Comments are not better.
Previous Entry
Add Memory
Share This Entry
Next Entry
24 comments
Reply
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
riftsh.livejournal.com
Sunday, September 16th, 2007 09:10 pm (UTC)
Это не просто набор мемов, а хорошо формализованный сценарий (или даже жанр, по определению Алвина Розенфельда):
The ubiquitous rubric "criticism of Israel," however, has also come to designate another kind of discourse--one that has almost become a politico-rhetorical genre unto itself, with its own identifiable vocabulary, narrative conventions, and predictable outcomes. At its ideational core is what the British scholar Bernard Harrison calls a "dialectical scam." It goes something like this: (1) Spot an Israeli action that can serve as the ground of "criticism of Israel" (e.g., Israel's military incursion into the area near Jenin in April 2002 in response to Palestinian terrorist massacres); (2) Then "dissent" in the strongest possible terms, for instance by likening the "razing of Jenin" to the destruction of the Warsaw Ghetto, while anticipating that "powerful" and "repressive" Jewish institutions will try to "silence" the critics by calling them anti-Semites; (3) When taken to task by more sober-minded critics who find that, contrary to your charge, there was no such thing as "the razing of Jenin" and that the IDF has nothing in common with the SS, cry "foul" and claim their censure perfectly illustrates the point that there really is a Jewish organizational conspiracy to silence "criticism of Israel" by branding the authors of such criticism "anti-Semites."
Link
Reply
Thread
Hide 1 comment
Show 1 comment
Thanks
cema.livejournal.com
Sunday, September 16th, 2007 09:56 pm (UTC)
"How does joining a debate become an effort to suppress it?" A good article, indeed.
Link
Reply
Thread from start
Parent
Previous Entry
Add Memory
Share This Entry
Next Entry
24 comments
Reply
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
The ubiquitous rubric "criticism of Israel," however, has also come to designate another kind of discourse--one that has almost become a politico-rhetorical genre unto itself, with its own identifiable vocabulary, narrative conventions, and predictable outcomes. At its ideational core is what the British scholar Bernard Harrison calls a "dialectical scam." It goes something like this: (1) Spot an Israeli action that can serve as the ground of "criticism of Israel" (e.g., Israel's military incursion into the area near Jenin in April 2002 in response to Palestinian terrorist massacres); (2) Then "dissent" in the strongest possible terms, for instance by likening the "razing of Jenin" to the destruction of the Warsaw Ghetto, while anticipating that "powerful" and "repressive" Jewish institutions will try to "silence" the critics by calling them anti-Semites; (3) When taken to task by more sober-minded critics who find that, contrary to your charge, there was no such thing as "the razing of Jenin" and that the IDF has nothing in common with the SS, cry "foul" and claim their censure perfectly illustrates the point that there really is a Jewish organizational conspiracy to silence "criticism of Israel" by branding the authors of such criticism "anti-Semites."
Thanks