Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 03:23 am
Everybody has mentioned it, I am not sure many have internalized it though.

Another article (among many): Caroline Glick, the Jerusalem Post.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1222017359617&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/Printer

Update. You did not like the tone? Did you like the contents? OK, here is an older link for you: http://blogs.jta.org/politics/2008/09/18/1765/palin-disinvited-from-iran-rally/

It's not about elections. It's about the Jewish organizations. Frankly, I feel a bit of shame, even though I am not a member of any.

Update. More reading for you from Jerusalem Post, this time from a Republicans-related organization. I am not a Republican overall, but in this respect I feel a lot of affinity.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1222017379006&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FPrinter
Page 1 of 2 << [1] [2] >>
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 08:17 am (UTC)
верные ленинцы :)
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 08:41 am (UTC)
Нервные ленивцы.

Да, это точно.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 08:44 am (UTC)
их сучествование убеждает меня в том, что еврейский заговор - миф.
единственный заговор - тот, с которым боролся Джо Маккарти
:)
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 10:27 am (UTC)
Мне кажется что перманентные истерики Катерины Глюк не вполне заслуживают цитирования.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 12:22 pm (UTC)
Haven't internalized that Iran's president wants to wipe Israel off the map or hasn't internalized that Sarah Palin is the coming of the Savior?
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 01:00 pm (UTC)
истерический крик базарной бабы из серии: людцы дорбыя эта што ж такое делается!!

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 01:25 pm (UTC)
Oh no, the Savior could be only One! (the One Whose Name Can Not Be Said, of course)
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 03:16 pm (UTC)
Истерика всего лишь тон, а то, что крупные и вроде бы уважаемые еврейские организации в кармане Демократической партии, это не шутка.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 03:18 pm (UTC)
Have not internalized that the large and ostensibly respected US Jewish organizations are in the pocket of the Democratic party.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 03:20 pm (UTC)
Нет, всё прекрасно?
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 03:48 pm (UTC)
I'm sure this will draw flames, but perhaps these US Jewish organizations you allude to are not necessarily Zionist.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 03:54 pm (UTC)
Some are not. But if they decided to organize a meeting against Ahmadinedjad, why does it matter?
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 04:05 pm (UTC)
Well, I don't know. This whole anti-Ahmedinedjad protest appears to have been completely FUBARed with regard to inviting Clinton and Palin.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 04:25 pm (UTC)
Это так всегда было, прошу заметить.
Американские евреи не голосуют по вопросам ближневосточной политики, это такой факт американской политической жизни, а голосуют за Демократов.
Истерика же Катарины Глюк касается иранских намерений.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 04:29 pm (UTC)
The organization acted correctly. One of the reasons I hope republicans loose is that we don't really need a war with Iran right now. And we don't need cheap talk either.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 05:50 pm (UTC)
Caroline Glick, not "Катарины Глюк", not even "Катерины Глюк".
American Jews is not a homogenious group. Just like Israeli Jews is not.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 05:51 pm (UTC)
а о чем речь? меня стошнило на первом абзаце.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 05:57 pm (UTC)
Caroline Glick, not "Катарины Глюк", not even "Катерины Глюк".
Да что Вы говорите? Каролина Глюк, а вовсе не Катерина Глюк? Мне как-то недосуг запоминать именя всяких оранжевых истеричек, так что когда я в следующий раз ошибусь, Вы меня снова поправьте, хорошо?
American Jews is not a homogenious group. Just like Israeli Jews is not.
Угу. Только не меньше 80% американских евреев голосуют за Демократов, более высокий контроль у Демократов есть только над голосами негритянской общины.

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 06:00 pm (UTC)
Once again, genius:Caroline Glick.
Looks like you have plenty of time to go into your own histerics.

80% (where's the figures from, incidentally?) is not 100%.
In your previous statement you made it sound like ALL American Jews are Dems.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 06:00 pm (UTC)
Generally speaking, we don't really need a war at all, right? But in case the war appears to be inevitable, it should take place according to the wishes of American electorate, in particular, when [livejournal.com profile] mme_n_b is in the fighting mood.

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 06:37 pm (UTC)
Precisely. As opposed to, say, the wishes of the Israeli electorate.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 06:40 pm (UTC)
Unfortunately, there peoples out there that don't give a shit about the appropriate war schedule and operate according to their own one. While the proper way of dealing with the present Iranian regime is debatable, the insistence that the conflict timing depends on the American policy is amusing.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 06:46 pm (UTC)
Hysteria is spelled in a different way. Perhaps, you should exercise your remote patriotism a little bit less and learn the language of your country a little bit more.
In your previous statement you made it sound like ALL American Jews are Dems.
I am afraid you should try to improve your reading comprehension I have not said that all American Jews vote Democratic ticket. Let's try to read the statement again:
Aмериканские евреи не голосуют по вопросам ближневосточной политики
You see here any mentions of the Dems?
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 06:50 pm (UTC)
Perhaps you should try to keep your urge to lecture to yourself, turlurlu!
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 06:53 pm (UTC)
Well, you don't really imagine that any conflict will start with Iran attacking America, do you?
Page 1 of 2 << [1] [2] >>