Account name:
Password
(OpenID?)
(Forgot it?)
Remember Me
You're viewing
cema
's journal
Create a Dreamwidth Account
Learn More
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
Reload page in style:
site
light
Просьба выражаться
Fish of features
September
2017
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Navigation
Recent Entries
Archive
Reading
Tags
Memories
Profile
Page Summary
saccovanzetti.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
vlader.livejournal.com
-
bunch of nonsence
luzhin.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
Style Credit
Style:
Blue
for
Drifting
by
Jennie Griner
Resources:
OSWD design
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Another catch from Hacker News
cema
Monday,
March
30th
,
2009
11:14 pm
http://www.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=My+Manhattan+Project&expire=&urlID=35003522&fb=Y&url=http://nymag.com/news/business/55687/&partnerID=73272
I won't comment it for now.
Previous Entry
Add Memory
Share This Entry
Next Entry
11 comments
Reply
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
saccovanzetti.livejournal.com
Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 10:40 am (UTC)
interesting
Link
Reply
Thread
Hide 1 comment
Show 1 comment
no subject
cema.livejournal.com
Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 11:57 am (UTC)
I am sure he skipped a few details.
Link
Reply
Thread from start
Parent
bunch of nonsence
vlader.livejournal.com
Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 03:34 pm (UTC)
Software does not ruin or create anything- takes data, processes data and spits it out. That's why French do not allow patents on software.
The core is some mathematical formula, finction etc., which is, with all due respect to our multiple programmer friends, is out of their league.
Here is the real culprits:
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-03/wp_quant?currentPage=all
http://oyc.yale.edu/economics/financial-markets/content/resources/Lecture12.pdf
Link
Reply
Thread
Hide 6 comments
Show 6 comments
Re: bunch of nonsence
vlader.livejournal.com
Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 03:36 pm (UTC)
Sorry for misspellings :)
Link
Reply
Thread from start
Parent
Re: bunch of nonsence
cema.livejournal.com
Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 05:13 pm (UTC)
Oh, of course it is... would not call it bullshit; arrogance. In any case, the core of the problem is elsewhere completely.
Link
Reply
Thread from start
Parent
Thread
Hide 4 comments
Show 4 comments
Re: bunch of nonsence
vlader.livejournal.com
Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 08:30 pm (UTC)
This non-sensical explanation is much more, how shall I say, reasonable:
http://ammosov.livejournal.com/423796.html
Link
Reply
Thread from start
Parent
Thread
Hide 3 comments
Show 3 comments
Re: bunch of nonsence
cema.livejournal.com
Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 08:42 pm (UTC)
Ah, but this was a different take: the "Look at me!" type.
Link
Reply
Thread from start
Parent
Thread
Hide 2 comments
Show 2 comments
Re: bunch of nonsence
vlader.livejournal.com
Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 09:39 pm (UTC)
True enough... Not even arrogance- self -embellishment?
Link
Reply
Thread from start
Parent
Thread
Hide 1 comment
Show 1 comment
Re: bunch of nonsence
cema.livejournal.com
Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 09:47 pm (UTC)
Something like that, yes. Self-aggrandizing.
Link
Reply
Thread from start
Parent
no subject
luzhin.livejournal.com
Wednesday, April 1st, 2009 05:30 am (UTC)
Сумасшедший?
Link
Reply
Thread
Hide 1 comment
Show 1 comment
no subject
cema.livejournal.com
Wednesday, April 1st, 2009 05:42 am (UTC)
Нет; думаю, это из серии "я тоже там был". Крупицы истины там есть, несомненно.
Link
Reply
Thread from start
Parent
Previous Entry
Add Memory
Share This Entry
Next Entry
11 comments
Reply
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
no subject
bunch of nonsence
The core is some mathematical formula, finction etc., which is, with all due respect to our multiple programmer friends, is out of their league.
Here is the real culprits:
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-03/wp_quant?currentPage=all
http://oyc.yale.edu/economics/financial-markets/content/resources/Lecture12.pdf
Re: bunch of nonsence
Re: bunch of nonsence
Re: bunch of nonsence
http://ammosov.livejournal.com/423796.html
Re: bunch of nonsence
Re: bunch of nonsence
Re: bunch of nonsence
no subject
no subject