September 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
34 56789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Wednesday, November 8th, 2006 09:40 pm
Изо всех результатов, о которых я слышал, меня больше всего заинтересовало, что в Аризоне проголосовали за то, чтобы английский язык стал в штате государственным.

Update. Ну и, конечно, запрет на affirmative action в Мичигане.
Thursday, November 9th, 2006 02:31 am (UTC)
1. For convenience.

2. Isolated examples do not prove discrimination.

3. As [livejournal.com profile] cema observed above, when the inability to learn a language is perceived as a handicap, the language proficiency requirements are waived; and, I believe, in these cases the translation services should be available.

A skinned knee does not entitle one to a handicapped parking space, and even a broken leg - only temporarily.
Thursday, November 9th, 2006 02:58 am (UTC)
1. Don't bother, on minor issues I'm willing to trust you without supporting documentation
2. It only takes one court case
3. I agree with you on all "shoulds" in this question. English should be a requirement. Translation should be available for elderly, the handicapped, and those fresh off the boat. Will this happen in real life? Unlikely. Especially since the main reason for making English official seems to be economy.