Palin's uninvitation

[cema]

Everybody has mentioned it, I am not sure many have internalized it though.

Another article (among many): Caroline Glick, the Jerusalem Post.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1222017359617&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/Printer

Update. You did not like the tone? Did you like the contents? OK, here is an older link for you: http://blogs.jta.org/politics/2008/09/18/1765/palin-disinvited-from-iran-rally/

It's not about elections. It's about the Jewish organizations. Frankly, I feel a bit of shame, even though I am not a member of any.

Update. More reading for you from Jerusalem Post, this time from a Republicans-related organization. I am not a Republican overall, but in this respect I feel a lot of affinity.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1222017379006&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FPrinter

Comments

Re: :)

[trurle.livejournal.com]

How MAD is related to the rhetoric?
In several, non-trivial ways. For instance, MAD assumes credible retaliation threat.

Re: :)

[mme-n-b.livejournal.com]

Not to rhetoric in general, please stick with the question. How is it related to the non-given speech by a non-vice-president?

Re: :)

[trurle.livejournal.com]

Non-speech! Sounds Orwellian, doesn't it?

We are not talking about non-speech by the non-vice-president or non-speech by the non-would-be-presidential-candidate, but about your rather amusing assumption that US may decide on the confrontation schedule.

Indeed, there is a certain dilemma: whether to attempt preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear capabilities by force, or to pray that MAD would work. Both options are military by their nature, and it is not US nor Israel who opted for the military confrontation.

Re: :)

[mme-n-b.livejournal.com]

I don't know about you, but I was talking about the specific theme of this post.

Re: :)

[trurle.livejournal.com]

link

Re: :)

[mme-n-b.livejournal.com]

Right. I'm discussing the speech. You're trying to go off on a tangent.

Re: :)

[trurle.livejournal.com]

Speech is not interesting, policy is.
The brawl, in particular, is stupid, as Clinton is even more belligerent on Iran than Palin.

Re: :)

[mme-n-b.livejournal.com]

Sorry, but I don't feel like discussing policy in any connection with Palin. The thought is too dismal. Personally, I think this whole election is a Russian plot. They are controlling McKaine through drugs, which is why his character changed so much, and also why he picked Palin. The idea is to get him elected and then assassinate him thus putting Palin in charge for four years during which Russia will be able to make immense strides towards winning the Second Cold War.

Re: :)

[trurle.livejournal.com]

You've opened my eyes!
But I have even better idea: the Russians control significant part of US electorate via the top-secret electro-magnetic mental control fields. Only the tinfoil hats can save you mind!

Re: :)

[mme-n-b.livejournal.com]

Nonsense - they know about the hats. The control is done by the hypnotic blinking of the voting-machine screens.

Re: :)

[trurle.livejournal.com]

Even if the tinfoil doesn't help, it certainly doesn't harm.
As for the voting: winning strategy would be voting with closed eyes. The result would be different from the Kremlin-induced.

Re: :)

[trurle.livejournal.com]

Well, if you consider the Russian threat to be paramount, you should definitely vote Obama.